LogFAQs > #941387789

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	White Man at BLM Protest loses his TESTICLE after a COP shot a BULLET there!!!
adjl 06/28/20 2:22:21 PM #31:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... In this paragraph 2 sentences are about what took place at the march. And the other sentence is only 2 words which is used to describe the subject of a neighboring sentence. Thus: I was marching Apartheid style At the Apartheid style march If the second sentence is not also about the march where does does the change of subject occur? SKARDAVNELNATE posted... so many other black americans that have been murdered in America. Apartheid style. Again, you really shouldn't have to try this hard to seem smarter than Duckbear, and you especially shouldn't be failing so hard to do so. No, that's not a proper place to put a period, but you shouldn't be rendered so incapable of understanding what's very obviously being said by a bit of misplaced punctuation. BeerOnTap posted... Yeah cuz these protestors arent throwing things. Burning down buildings (in my city they sat a building on fire and there was a child inside). Beating people up. In some cases shooting and killing people. Several cops have been killed in all of this. David Dorn was shot and killed by a protester. Police arent perfect. But this Marxist mob is insane. There are countless stories and videos out there of police full-on assaulting people who are not in any way being violent. If it were just collateral damage from handling violent riots, sure, but that's very much not what's happening at most of these protests. Heck, there's ample evidence out there of police themselves smashing windows to give themselves justification to start responding to peaceful protests violently. In many cases, police are the ones instigating violence. Furthermore, regardless of the challenges of crowd control, there is absolutely no situation in which a police officer is justified in firing a rubber bullet point blank at somebody's junk. That's not crowd control, that's not dealing with a difficult situation, that's not restraining somebody who needs to be arrested, that's "I'm angry so I'm going to hurt you now." A civilian would be convicted of attempted murder for what he did, no questions. This is exactly the sort of behaviour these protests are complaining about, and displaying exactly that behaviour in dealing with protests against it really isn't helping their case. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:941387789] in White Man ... [t:78806443]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>In this paragraph 2 sentences are about what took place at the march. And the other sentence is only 2 words which is used to describe the subject of a neighboring sentence. Thus: I was marching Apartheid style At the Apartheid style march If the second sentence is not also about the march where does does the change of subject occur?</quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>so many other black americans that have been murdered in America. Apartheid style.</quote> Again, you really shouldn't have to try this hard to seem smarter than Duckbear, and you especially shouldn't be failing so hard to do so. No, that's not a proper place to put a period, but you shouldn't be rendered so incapable of understanding what's very obviously being said by a bit of misplaced punctuation. BeerOnTap posted... </cite> <quote>Yeah cuz these protestors arent throwing things. Burning down buildings (in my city they sat a building on fire and there was a child inside). Beating people up. In some cases shooting and killing people. Several cops have been killed in all of this. David Dorn was shot and killed by a protester. Police arent perfect. But this Marxist mob is insane.</quote> There are countless stories and videos out there of police full-on assaulting people who are not in any way being violent. If it were just collateral damage from handling violent riots, sure, but that's very much not what's happening at most of these protests. Heck, there's ample evidence out there of police themselves smashing windows to give themselves justification to start responding to peaceful protests violently. In many cases, police are the ones instigating violence. Furthermore, regardless of the challenges of crowd control, there is absolutely no situation in which a police officer is justified in firing a rubber bullet point blank at somebody's junk. That's not crowd control, that's not dealing with a difficult situation, that's not restraining somebody who needs to be arrested, that's "I'm angry so I'm going to hurt you now." A civilian would be convicted of attempted murder for what he did, no questions. This is exactly the sort of behaviour these protests are complaining about, and displaying exactly that behaviour in dealing with protests against it really isn't helping their case. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1