LogFAQs > #941387631

interesting I have the most polarized stats by type so far. though it does not surprise me. I LOVE dark type both in concept and in terms of designs like to an insanely consistent degree. If a trainer in the pokemon universe i'd totally be some edgy exclusively dark-type user or something lol

Maybe predictably as "someone who likes dark type a lot", fairy type consistently pisses me off lol. Both being the aesthetic opposites and fairy being what's destroyed dark type's strength the most, was weird when gen 6 happened and so many of my least favorite pokemon retroactively became fairy type hahaha.

Pretty concretely knew those would by my favorite and least favorite types but i wasn't sure how everything between would pan out. Interesting fighting is so high...it definitely didn't used to be but i've grown more fond of it with time, same with dragon so high tbh, both those are recent developments. Ice and Grass low is surprising because I think of myself as liking both a good deal, and my favorite pokemon is literally Ice Type!!! (sneasel...so half dark type too..), but I guess there's plenty of examples in the low-ranking types i'm not fond of too that are what's bringing them down.

The outliers in the positive zone are definitely pokemon i like and negative zone definitely pokemon i dislike, but it's interesting to see which ones wind up being the least common in that position; not what i would have guessed necessarily though the only ones I'd say are actually "surprising" to show up as an outlier to me are Shelgon and Drizzile, did not know that those were disliked by most : (

The avg by gen is not really what i'd have expected at all, though maybe the way it "feels" is more based on how many in my top X show up in each (for example, gen 6 i think of as my least favorite because every other gen is represented multiple times in my top 20-30 or so, but it isn't. but that stat doesn't get expressed since I gave all of my top ~100 a score of 10). Still, 2 and 3 both at the top absolutely makes sense, but my mental expectation is more like 2>3>7>4>8>5>1>6, that's probably more "feeling" than any mathematical accuracy. How excited I was about Type:Null/Silvally/Lycanroc/etc, but in reality most pokemon in gen 7 don't make me nearly as happy. and 1 probably 'feels' lower just out of frustration with genwunners/gen1-pandering when i'm a bigger fan of a lot of new stuff.

Will be interesting to play around with other ways of calculating this stuff on my own time sometime, now that I have rated/ranked every pokemon, to see if that changes the order of any of these stats!
---

time