Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | Politics Containment Topic 305: Where's the beef? With the police. |
Corrik7 06/15/20 6:52:59 PM #218: | Mr Lasastryke posted... how the fuck do you not understand what i said?Uh, what planet are you from? Inviso posted a single video of when police did a poor job with a white person. And compared it to a single time when they did a reasonable job with an African-American person. You would have to be off your rocker to think white people haven't been shot fleeing the police when deemed a risk, and also off your rocker to think African-americans haven't fled before where police failed to try to stop them with lethal means. You could watch cops and live pd to see the latter pretty obviously. If posting a terrible argument is obliterating your position, then lol at you, bud. We can all cherry pick a video or two to make an obviously nonsense argument. It would be like me posting one of a white man being shot and one of a african-american man not being and saying white people are being killed in situations African-americans aren't. It's literally that dumb of an argument. It's why it wasn't worth responding to. The ??? Is to you for thinking it was a good argument. It's very simple. The laws, re-affirmed by the supreme court, give the police the legal means to decide to stop a violent offender / risk to the public with whatever means necessary (also when they are being attacked also - as seen in the struggle, officer being punched, and the taser shot at him). The police being out to protect the public, but not obligated to, should stop at all costs a perpetrator that has shown propensity to violence from being able to harm the public, preferably by detaining or stopping with force as a last resort. What he did was reasonable, legal, and not surprising. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |