LogFAQs > #940441446

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topic18 year old women are
joe40001
06/10/20 8:03:36 AM
#49:


Conflict posted...
Because people aren't going to completely avoid it simply because it doesn't have a 100% prevention rate

There's a chance you'll get killed by a car or in a mugging just going outside. Might as well stay in the house permanently

People always go there too. "Some risk exists in everything, so not doing things because of risk is dumb."

But you know it's not dumb. We should concern ourselves with non-trivial risks. And the risk of pregnancy or STDs is far from trivial even using condoms or the pill.

When we are talking about bringing a human life into the world or catching an STD those are pretty big stakes, is it really "no need to worry" if it's a 10% chance?

We aren't talking about lightning strikes here, these odds are pretty high considering the stakes. I don't think a prudent person like yourself can hand-wave them away. And yet I see it all the time. I'm forced to assume that these otherwise smart people either 1. Know something I don't know (which I continue to ask but seem to get no evidence of) 2. Know the real risks and just ignore them because sex is so desirable that they don't want to think about it.

---
"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1