LogFAQs > #938650740

Veedrock- posted...

Hey look Zang can't find the point. What else is new.

I read the article, I know what happened.

what point do you have though

you can't tell someone that they don't get the point, but then refuse to actually elaborate on said point.

that just screams that you don't actually have a point.

paulisdabomb posted...

And you know that it wouldn't solve anything because...? Has it been attempted? I don't think so. No offence, but your argument doesn't make sense to me, it's not even really an argument tbh. If violent people have fewer means to be violent, then even if the behaviour or urge is still present, it won't be able to manifest itself as much, often or severe. Excuse my graphic example, but beating someone to death (in world were guns are outlawed) or simply pulling a trigger, are two very different things. This means violence would naturally drop if guns aren't an option.

All I really see is unwillingness to change, or even to try. It's sad :(

except that, if someone wants to cause violence, they absolutely will, as proven by, uh, fucking everywhere.

this situation is not unique to just america, regardless of how you keep trying to write your narrative. we have ample evidence of where guns are outlawed in other countries, and instead people go on stabbing sprees, or use other implements to cause havoc.

---

plop