LogFAQs > #938604061

monkmith posted...

where are you even getting this?

The trial.

Stop looking up CNN and ABC articles and blogger opinions on this. Go watch the trial.

because every source i look up suggests that the minute between the call to the cops ending and the fight starting would either be far to short for that to happen or would only be a possibility among many.

Then your "sources" are terrible and deny basic facts.

Also the "one possibility among many" card is a terrible one to play because if your argument is "Well shucks I guess we just don't know what happened." then Zimmerman is still innocent by default. Which also makes it nothing like this case.

Even in head in the sand fantasy land, the cases aren't the same.

either way it doesn't change the fact that zimmerman took his gun with him when he decided he'd play cop. found and followed a teen because they 'looked suspicious'. and ignored the cops telling him not to follow the teen.

False. The cops said "You don't have to do that." not "Don't do that." Zimmerman never ignored cop advice and infact did stop later when the dispatcher actually asked him too.

Although for the record, it would still be irrelevant even if you weren't lying.

Second, none of that is illegal nor a justification for trying to murder someone. You can't follow and attack someone because they walked down a public street.

Third. That's Still not comparable to this case.

"He walked down a public street so I had to follow him, hide, suckerpunch and attempt to murder him" =/= "These two guys chased me in a truck and jumped out screaming while waving a gun at me so in a panic I tried to grab their gun"

How can you continue to pretend you're incapable of understanding that? Because you're not. Just admit you got duped by the media years ago and move on.

Even in head in the sand fantasy land, the cases aren't the same.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair!
https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob