LogFAQs > #938347788

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do you agree with Biden guaranteeing a woman VP just because they're a woman?
Houston 04/30/20 1:11:09 AM #46:	Evening_Dragon posted... It was just a basic-ass appeal. If the best candidate is a woman, go ahead, but the point of how and why he did it was such obvious pandering. And god, I hate using that word. Feels nasty and conservatrolly just to say it. I agree. Pandering at the utmost highest level. Eliminating half of all people solely on the basis of gender. Not on the basis of qualifications, experience, relativity--- anything --- no, the first qualification is that you have to be female. It's a huge red flag on Dem priorities and values. --- "Sometimes you will never know the value of a moment until it becomes a memory." - Dr Seuss <cite>Houston posted [p:938347788] in Do you agr... [t:78641600]...</cite> <quote>Evening_Dragon posted... </cite> <quote>It was just a basic-ass appeal. If the best candidate is a woman, go ahead, but the point of how and why he did it was such obvious pandering. And god, I hate using that word. Feels nasty and conservatrolly just to say it.</quote> I agree. Pandering at the utmost highest level. Eliminating half of all people solely on the basis of gender. Not on the basis of qualifications, experience, relativity--- anything --- no, the first qualification is that you have to be female. It's a huge red flag on Dem priorities and values. --- "Sometimes you will never know the value of a moment until it becomes a memory." - Dr Seuss</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1