LogFAQs > #933930960

red sox 777 posted...

With regard to the whistleblower, I don't see how the Whistleblower Protection Act can trump the Sixth Amendment. Seems like failure to confront the President with his accuser is on its own sufficient grounds to acquit him.

Good lord, man. I hope this is a troll post.

The whistleblower isn't an accuser. They saw something and reported on it. Additionally, it's not a he-said-she-said situation. The contents of said whistleblow have been independently verified by many people, including Trump himself.

It's like if someone shot someone on fifth avenue, and one person dials the cops to report a shooting. The cops arrive, question 100 witnesses who say it happened, get the video tapes of 3 stores with closed circuit cameras pointing at the crime, and the murderer confesses, but the specific person who initially phoned in the crime went home after the call.

You don't need that original caller to come to court. You have 100 witnesses, video footage, and a confession.

---

You did indeed stab me in the back. However, you are only level one, whilst I am level 50. That means I should remain uninjured.