LogFAQs > #931873260

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 254: Pete's Whine Cave
xp1337 12/21/19 3:11:14 AM #358:	Corrik7 posted... So the position of power was the reasoning for the hire. Correct? Probably. Corrik7 posted... Now, are we going to act like Joe Biden didn't know his son was hired by a company in a country he dealt with for a job he had zero experience or knowledge regarding in an extremely high paying job? I mean, we aren't going to go that route right? Not sure. But I'll accept that Biden likely knew his son got the job. Corrik7 posted... So, Joe either knows something is fishy there or he is incompetent, right? He may be aware that Burisma is trying to get influence. He could also know that such an attempt is futile. Corrik7 posted... So, if he knows something is fishy in the country that he supposedly is trying to root out corruption in, you would think he would advise his son to leave the job, refuse it, or investigate the company itself right? Hunter is an adult so faulting Joe for Hunter's decision here is an inversion of the "sins of the father." I'm also not sure it's appropriate for Joe to leverage the investigative power of the US Government against Burisma even if he thinks they're being sus. Or do you think he should pull a Giuliani and run some shadow investigation that is nebulously connected to the office of the VP in all but official record? Corrik7 posted... Yet, it was the investigator that was investigating the company for corruption that Biden had reason to believe was corrupt right before his eyes that he forced out of the Ukrainian government, while his son continued to draw his paycheck from said company. red covered this already: red13n posted... Also I know red sox is being facetious here but I know Wang is in deep so let me just refute this real quick. The prosecutor had stopped investigating the company(and others unrelated) Hunter Biden was working for at the time he was fired. He had said publicly a long while(A year+) that he would prosecute corruption but it had been a case of his words being far from his actions(He was, in fact, corrupt). --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:931873260] in Politics C... [t:78268798]...</cite> <quote>Corrik7 posted... </cite> <quote> So the position of power was the reasoning for the hire. Correct?</quote>Probably. Corrik7 posted... </cite> <quote>Now, are we going to act like Joe Biden didn't know his son was hired by a company in a country he dealt with for a job he had zero experience or knowledge regarding in an extremely high paying job? I mean, we aren't going to go that route right?</quote>Not sure. But I'll accept that Biden likely knew his son got the job. Corrik7 posted... </cite> <quote> So, Joe either knows something is fishy there or he is incompetent, right?</quote>He may be aware that Burisma is trying to get influence. He could also know that such an attempt is futile. Corrik7 posted... </cite> <quote> So, if he knows something is fishy in the country that he supposedly is trying to root out corruption in, you would think he would advise his son to leave the job, refuse it, or investigate the company itself right?</quote>Hunter is an adult so faulting Joe for Hunter's decision here is an inversion of the "sins of the father." I'm also not sure it's appropriate for Joe to leverage the investigative power of the US Government against Burisma even if he thinks they're being sus. Or do you think he should pull a Giuliani and run some shadow investigation that is nebulously connected to the office of the VP in all but official record? Corrik7 posted... </cite> <quote> Yet, it was the investigator that was investigating the company for corruption that Biden had reason to believe was corrupt right before his eyes that he forced out of the Ukrainian government, while his son continued to draw his paycheck from said company.</quote>red covered this already: red13n posted... </cite> <quote>Also I know red sox is being facetious here but I know Wang is in deep so let me just refute this real quick. The prosecutor had stopped investigating the company(and others unrelated) Hunter Biden was working for at the time he was fired. He had said publicly a long while(A year+) that he would prosecute corruption but it had been a case of his words being far from his actions(He was, in fact, corrupt).</quote> --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1