LogFAQs > #931822036

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Was Tulsi Gabbard wise in voting "present" on both articles?
Zeus 12/19/19 9:39:36 PM #20:	I don't think it matters regardless. Gabbard isn't a real contender, considering she's faring about as poorly as Andrew Yang. And the people who are going to be the most upset about how she voted would never have voted for her anyway. The big advantage is that it demonstrates consistency in ideology, though. WastelandCowboy posted... By the way, I hate this new quoting system. Dumb. It's the worst. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:931822036] in Was Tulsi ... [t:78266444]...</cite> <quote>I don't think it matters regardless. Gabbard isn't a real contender, considering she's faring about as poorly as Andrew Yang. And the people who are going to be the most upset about how she voted would never have voted for her anyway. The big advantage is that it demonstrates consistency in ideology, though. WastelandCowboy posted... </cite> <quote>By the way, I hate this new quoting system. Dumb.</quote> It's the worst. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1