LogFAQs > #930705141

Prestoff posted...

It's simply illogical for a qualification to get into "heaven" is by believing in God without doing anything to prove its own existence. Hence the post I quoted to be true.

Again, if by belief in God you mean 100% undeniable certainty that God exists then no, God doesn't ask for that, nor is that a requirement for anything. God doesn't even fully reveal themselves, so how could they possibly ask anybody to believe in them (in that way)? People wouldn't even know what the hell exactly to believe in. This is (one reason) why it's impossible to have undeniable evidence of God's existence. That isn't to say that there's no evidence at all for God's existence. But it's not the kind of evidence that would satisfy a skeptic. There's no such evidence. The existence of such evidence is illogical.

When I'm talking about God, I'm talking about the Judeo Christian God from the Abrahamic religions, which can easily be proven wrong by debunking the claims from the bible.

Then why the hell would you even mention this God? Why would you waste a second of your time thinking about it? Honestly, do you get any sort of satisfaction at all from beating straw men?

In my opinion, even if something is illogical there will always be people who believe in illogical things because of reason and I won't fault them for it because sometimes I do the same thing as well.

I think if something is illogical you should call it illogical, you shouldn't believe in it and you should let people know they're silly for believing in it. Now, how is it illogical to believe in God? Lack of undeniable evidence doesn't equal illogical.