LogFAQs > #930477272

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Elizabeth Banks: "Men don't go see women do action movies."
Solid_Seb 11/21/19 12:03:33 PM #38:	The Trent posted... Solid_Seb posted... The Trent posted... Solid_Seb posted... Her point is semi-valid, having an established franchise goes a long way to make a successful movie, but blaming men is laughable. Woman didn't go see it either, why not blame them? let's not act like charlie's angels isn't an established IP as well though Theres very different levels of being 'established', charlies angels is a world of difference from marvel or dc in that regard. i'm not arguing that but it's not like she had to create something out of thin air, so the argument about an established franchise going a long way to making a successful movie is really thin everyone has heard of charlie's angels it's not like fucking stupid avatar where you're building an IP from scratch it's an established franchise, it's charlie's angels Not thin at all, you're still ignoring the huge difference in establishment. A bad dc movie is still gonna do well, since people who like the franchise will see it regardless. This isn't the case for charlies angels, there just aren't enough fans of the franchise to make up for it. <cite>Solid_Seb posted [p:930477272] in Elizabeth ... [t:78183509]...</cite> <quote>The Trent posted...</cite> <quote>Solid_Seb posted...</cite> <quote>The Trent posted...</cite> <quote>Solid_Seb posted...</cite> <quote>Her point is semi-valid, having an established franchise goes a long way to make a successful movie, but blaming men is laughable. Woman didn't go see it either, why not blame them?</quote> let's not act like charlie's angels isn't an established IP as well though</quote> Theres very different levels of being 'established', charlies angels is a world of difference from marvel or dc in that regard.</quote> i'm not arguing that but it's not like she had to create something out of thin air, so the argument about an established franchise going a long way to making a successful movie is really thin everyone has heard of charlie's angels it's not like fucking stupid avatar where you're building an IP from scratch it's an established franchise, it's charlie's angels</quote> Not thin at all, you're still ignoring the huge difference in establishment. A bad dc movie is still gonna do well, since people who like the franchise will see it regardless. This isn't the case for charlies angels, there just aren't enough fans of the franchise to make up for it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1