LogFAQs > #929401802

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Who are you voting for? I like this Andrew Yang guy.
Zeus 10/29/19 6:11:15 PM #12:	Yang is a lousy candidate. He has the same lack of experience and policy knowledge that Trump has, in addition to some stupidly far-left policy plans. The moment he brought up UBI automatically disqualified him. Now he's literally giving money away and he can't make it into the top 5. Otherwise I had been a Booker fan for years (especially after seeing Street Fight) and assumed he'd be president someday, but he's been so hollow on the debate stage which belies that he's more the product of self-promotion and media hype than anything. Right now, I don't strongly favor any of the candidates. Tulsi Gabbard scored some points last debate, Mayor Pete has occasionally been alright on some things (although the guy seems he's going to be yet another hawk, which I dislike), Biden is the lesser of several evils, and I kinda like Klobuchar's tough gal persona. The candidates who I strongly oppose are Sanders (who has no business doing this -- he's spent almost his entire life in politics yet his foreign policy knowledge is as weak as Trump's and shouldn't be running as a Democrat at all), Yang (UBI), Harris (so many reasons), Warren (anti-business, plus she's pushing to change capital gains taxes which would fuck over people saving for retirement), and Beto OR (laughable policies plus gun stances). Oh, and John Steyer seems like an idiot. deoxxys posted... Liberal media gunna fuck over the election again and get Trump re-elected again because they cant unite. But they've been bashing Trump so consistently! WastelandCowboy posted... Id like Tulsi Gabbard to win, but the way its looking, she might not make it out of the primaries. Especially if the DNC fucks it all up again. Going to be honest, I'm also starting to lean towards Gabbard after that Syria discussion where she was the only candidate to strongly decry America's never-ending wars (iirc, I think even Bernie said a few words in support of our efforts in Syria which seemed out of character) DirtBasedSoap posted... I dont think anyone other than Bernie has the potential to actually beat trump in the election next year so him. Bernie has no potential for beating Trump. Although he can energize a crowd, he's absurdly fringe and only plays well to younger demographics who are already going to vote Democrat. At least Warren has some broader buy-in. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:929401802] in Who are yo... [t:78119892]...</cite> <quote>Yang is a lousy candidate. He has the same lack of experience and policy knowledge that Trump has, in addition to some stupidly far-left policy plans. The moment he brought up UBI automatically disqualified him. Now he's literally giving money away and he can't make it into the top 5. Otherwise I had been a Booker fan for years (especially after seeing Street Fight) and assumed he'd be president someday, but he's been so hollow on the debate stage which belies that he's more the product of self-promotion and media hype than anything. Right now, I don't strongly favor any of the candidates. Tulsi Gabbard scored some points last debate, Mayor Pete has occasionally been alright on some things (although the guy seems he's going to be yet another hawk, which I dislike), Biden is the lesser of several evils, and I kinda like Klobuchar's tough gal persona. The candidates who I strongly oppose are Sanders (who has no business doing this -- he's spent almost his entire life in politics yet his foreign policy knowledge is as weak as Trump's and shouldn't be running as a Democrat at all), Yang (UBI), Harris (so many reasons), Warren (anti-business, plus she's pushing to change capital gains taxes which would fuck over people saving for retirement), and Beto OR (laughable policies plus gun stances). Oh, and John Steyer seems like an idiot. deoxxys posted...</cite> <quote>Liberal media gunna fuck over the election again and get Trump re-elected again because they cant unite.</quote> But they've been bashing Trump so consistently! WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote>Id like Tulsi Gabbard to win, but the way its looking, she might not make it out of the primaries. Especially if the DNC fucks it all up again.</quote> Going to be honest, I'm also starting to lean towards Gabbard after that Syria discussion where she was the only candidate to strongly decry America's never-ending wars (iirc, I think even Bernie said a few words in support of our efforts in Syria which seemed out of character) DirtBasedSoap posted...</cite> <quote>I dont think anyone other than Bernie has the potential to actually beat trump in the election next year so him.</quote> Bernie has no potential for beating Trump. Although he can energize a crowd, he's absurdly fringe and only plays well to younger demographics who are already going to vote Democrat. At least Warren has some broader buy-in. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1