LogFAQs > #929271445

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Texas jury rules against dad trying to stop 7yo son's gender transition
gunplagirl 10/26/19 3:56:20 PM #345:	viewmaster_pi posted... gunplagirl posted... You'll believe any bullshit that affirms your disgust and disbelief that transgender youth exist. Why is that bullshit? Better yet, why is the "evidence" the mom has to claim he's female not bullshit? There's no reason. You don't care about this kid, you just want to see your "side" push forward. Ahahaha The court had all but one juror agree to grant the mother sole custody. The father's entire argument brought in therapists who had never spoken with his kid. All the therapists who the mother brought in, as well as social services and whatnot spoke in private with the daughter and she responded consistently that she's a girl, nobody's forcing her, and that she was afraid of her father because she wouldn't be allowed to dress or act like a girl and that the father refused to call her by her name (Luna). The judge ignored all of this and still decided both parents had to decide together. Keep in mind, for the millionth time, all the transition care until she's at least 10 are purely social in nature. Behaving as a girl, dressing as one, being called by her chosen name, etc. The father and other people who are having kneejerk reactions are the ones bringing up surgical intervention that's years away. Hell, the judge even stated in her ruling that the father had disrespected the privacy of his child and as such was forced to take down his blogs although the damage had been done. So basically? The judge ignored the actual reasonable ruling in favor of one that hurts the child by having her torn between a household that loves and embraces her, and one that will not allow her to embrace her identity and even made her a national talking point for transphobes who want to use her as a weapon in their war on trans people. That is to say, the professionals here were all in consensus and it's your side that doesn't actually care about the child, you just want to deny the kid a chance to transition socially due to personal hangups you have against transgender people. --- https://i.imgtc.ws/x2KBsjI.png <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:929271445] in Texas jury... [t:78108026]...</cite> <quote>viewmaster_pi posted...</cite> <quote>gunplagirl posted... </cite> <quote>You'll believe any bullshit that affirms your disgust and disbelief that transgender youth exist.</quote>Why is that bullshit? Better yet, why is the "evidence" the mom has to claim he's female not bullshit? There's no reason. You don't care about this kid, you just want to see your "side" push forward. </quote> Ahahaha The court had all but one juror agree to grant the mother sole custody. The father's entire argument brought in therapists who had never spoken with his kid. All the therapists who the mother brought in, as well as social services and whatnot spoke in private with the daughter and she responded consistently that she's a girl, nobody's forcing her, and that she was afraid of her father because she wouldn't be allowed to dress or act like a girl and that the father refused to call her by her name (Luna). The judge ignored all of this and still decided both parents had to decide together. Keep in mind, for the millionth time, all the transition care until she's at least 10 are purely social in nature. Behaving as a girl, dressing as one, being called by her chosen name, etc. The father and other people who are having kneejerk reactions are the ones bringing up surgical intervention that's years away. Hell, the judge even stated in her ruling that the father had disrespected the privacy of his child and as such was forced to take down his blogs although the damage had been done. So basically? The judge ignored the actual reasonable ruling in favor of one that hurts the child by having her torn between a household that loves and embraces her, and one that will not allow her to embrace her identity and even made her a national talking point for transphobes who want to use her as a weapon in their war on trans people. That is to say, the professionals here were all in consensus and it's your side that doesn't actually care about the child, you just want to deny the kid a chance to transition socially due to personal hangups you have against transgender people. --- https://i.imgtc.ws/x2KBsjI.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1