LogFAQs > #929128438

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Transgender Cyclist Wins Female Cycling World Championship
pinky0926 10/23/19 6:42:41 AM #104:	gunplagirl posted... unpleasant_milk posted... This is what happens when you let the politically correct driven mobs out shout the biological facts about gender strengths and science. All for the sake of their own agenda, to the detriment of a fair and balanced competitive playing field in sports. So if I'm hearing you right, you're suggesting that we ban all cisgender athletes until they undergo a second puberty and are on hormones for a period of 2+ years prior to having their eligibility restored, all in the interest of fair and even playing ground? Seems a bit extreme but if you can get the support behind it, I say go for it. I think the sensible thing here is that we need to collect more evidence (not biological rational or concept), and then let the evidence guide decision making. The fact remains, there is not enough strong evidence to either end of the argument to support what should be an evidence based decision. There is just not enough well-controlled studies on this topic. --- CE's Resident Scotsman. https://imgur.com/ILz2ZbV <cite>pinky0926 posted [p:929128438] in Transgende... [t:78101732]...</cite> <quote>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>unpleasant_milk posted...</cite> <quote>This is what happens when you let the politically correct driven mobs out shout the biological facts about gender strengths and science. All for the sake of their own agenda, to the detriment of a fair and balanced competitive playing field in sports.</quote> So if I'm hearing you right, you're suggesting that we ban all cisgender athletes until they undergo a second puberty and are on hormones for a period of 2+ years prior to having their eligibility restored, all in the interest of fair and even playing ground? Seems a bit extreme but if you can get the support behind it, I say go for it.</quote> I think the sensible thing here is that we need to collect more evidence (not biological rational or concept), and then let the evidence guide decision making. The fact remains, there is not enough strong evidence to either end of the argument to support what should be an evidence based decision. There is just not enough well-controlled studies on this topic. --- CE's Resident Scotsman. https://imgur.com/ILz2ZbV</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1