LogFAQs > #928025428

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Sorry guys but I never saw the appeal of Beastie Boys
Hotel_Security 09/27/19 1:51:45 PM #8:	Same here. Always felt they were pretty weak. Sabotage is a fun song but that's about it for me. Not to mention that, when you listen to them now, you realize that like every single part of their songs are sampled from elsewhere. Like EVERYTHING. They couldn't even exist nowadays for all the massive amount of sample fees they would be paying out which they didn't regulate back then. Maybe it's me but a band entirely built on sampling other peoples' work just isn't going to rate as highly for me. They're rhymes just sounds wack, they are un-melonic and just straight up weird. More a sign of the times. They've definitely got a late-80's/early 90's feel to their music. Heck, listen to the Fresh Prince's albums from back then and those sound just as cheesy. <cite>Hotel_Security posted [p:928025428] in Sorry guys... [t:78045995]...</cite> <quote>Same here. Always felt they were pretty weak. Sabotage is a fun song but that's about it for me. Not to mention that, when you listen to them now, you realize that like every single part of their songs are sampled from elsewhere. Like EVERYTHING. They couldn't even exist nowadays for all the massive amount of sample fees they would be paying out which they didn't regulate back then. Maybe it's me but a band entirely built on sampling other peoples' work just isn't going to rate as highly for me. They're rhymes just sounds wack, they are un-melonic and just straight up weird. More a sign of the times. They've definitely got a late-80's/early 90's feel to their music. Heck, listen to the Fresh Prince's albums from back then and those sound just as cheesy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1