LogFAQs > #926415228

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 235: Autopsy-Turvy
ChaosTonyV4 08/22/19 4:55:37 PM #413:	LordoftheMorons posted... Jakyl25 posted... Honestly isnt that how the founders intended it to work? EDIT: This is not me defending the concept of the Electoral College Yeah it seems like its the correct legal decision, but the fact that thats intended behavior is fucking bananas and should be changed with a constitutional amendment (preferably abolishing the electoral college, but at minimum binding a states EVs to its popular vote winner). I truly dont understand how this makes sense. How do we vote for electors when theyre not on the ballot? Whats the point in voting if an unelected elector can just pick whomever they want? --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado <cite>ChaosTonyV4 posted [p:926415228] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>LordoftheMorons posted...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted... </cite> <quote>Honestly isnt that how the founders intended it to work? EDIT: This is not me defending the concept of the Electoral College</quote>Yeah it seems like its the correct legal decision, but the fact that thats intended behavior is fucking bananas and should be changed with a constitutional amendment (preferably abolishing the electoral college, but at minimum binding a states EVs to its popular vote winner). </quote> I truly dont understand how this makes sense. How do we vote for electors when theyre not on the ballot? Whats the point in voting if an unelected elector can just pick whomever they want? --- Phantom Dust. "I'll just wait for time to prove me right again." - Vlado</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1