LogFAQs > #926413948

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 235: Autopsy-Turvy
red sox 777 08/22/19 4:28:53 PM #412:	LordoftheMorons posted... Jakyl25 posted... Honestly isnt that how the founders intended it to work? EDIT: This is not me defending the concept of the Electoral College Yeah it seems like its the correct legal decision, but the fact that thats intended behavior is fucking bananas and should be changed with a constitutional amendment (preferably abolishing the electoral college, but at minimum binding a states EVs to its popular vote winner). The only popular vote winner in a presidential election is a slate of electors. If you don't like how they vote, you can vote for different electors. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest! <cite>red sox 777 posted [p:926413948] in Politics C... [t:77943564]...</cite> <quote>LordoftheMorons posted...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted... </cite> <quote>Honestly isnt that how the founders intended it to work? EDIT: This is not me defending the concept of the Electoral College</quote>Yeah it seems like its the correct legal decision, but the fact that thats intended behavior is fucking bananas and should be changed with a constitutional amendment (preferably abolishing the electoral college, but at minimum binding a states EVs to its popular vote winner). </quote> The only popular vote winner in a presidential election is a slate of electors. If you don't like how they vote, you can vote for different electors. --- September 1, 2003; November 4, 2007; September 2, 2013 Congratulations to DP Oblivion in the Guru Contest!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1