Like if you want a Star Wars example that I think really illustrates plot hole vs not plot hole:
Hyperdrive. So in The Last Jedi the Hyperdrive suicide crash that totally wrecks that giant ship. Also hyperdrive tracking. With that stuff existing, particularly the former, it creates a sort of overarching plot hole in all sorts in that space combat throughout the series no longer makes sense-- why had it never been done, why isn't it being done all the time to save manpower for space combat?
What you're arguing is more like, what if The Last Jedi never existed, why couldn't they do that stuff? The plot to any movie in the series never claimed or implied it could be done at any point so there's not really a reason to assume it should be even if the movie doesn't go into depth refuting that point-- you thinking maybe it should be able to be done does not make it a plot hole. That's just you overanalyzing and trying to force your view of what the plot should be rather than just taking in what's presented.
I argued til I was blue in the face about the hyperspeed ramming. ---
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Division 2