LogFAQs > #924053239

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic #228 - Orbs you glad I didn't say banana?
Inviso 06/30/19 12:21:18 PM #112:	red sox 777 posted... Inviso posted... red sox 777 posted... Also if you are saying he has the ability to incept concerns in people's minds and then exploit them, like in Inception, that's really high praise and more than I'm willing to give. I'm saying that conservatives are more gullible and fearful than liberals. It's easier to tell them "this thing is bad and wants to get you!" and have them believe it. Hence why we can have a literal Muslim ban, yet the biggest holiday in the fucking country is the thing under attack. The debate question called for one nice thing. You don't have to disclose all of your background support for that thing. This is not a financial disclosure where you have to disclose everything. You can just omit the part about conservatives being gullible. It's still truthful. Because you were only asked for one nice thing. I think the issue we're having is that you believe Hillary should have to lie in order to appease easily-offended conservative snowflakes, whereas I don't think she should have lowered herself to lie and claim a vile human being has any positive qualities. Like, where does the line stop for you in terms of who is, and who isn't, worthy of that kind of respect? John Wayne Gacy? Osama Bin Laden? Adolf Hitler? I know I'm being hyperbolic, but my point is...where is your line for the point where we stop coddling deplorable (sorry to trigger you) assholes by telling them they're not ALL bad? --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso <cite>Inviso posted [p:924053239] in Politics C... [t:77826040]...</cite> <quote><cite>red sox 777 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote><cite>red sox 777 posted...</cite> <quote>Also if you are saying he has the ability to incept concerns in people's minds and then exploit them, like in Inception, that's really high praise and more than I'm willing to give.</quote> I'm saying that conservatives are more gullible and fearful than liberals. It's easier to tell them "this thing is bad and wants to get you!" and have them believe it. Hence why we can have a literal Muslim ban, yet the biggest holiday in the fucking country is the thing under attack.</quote> The debate question called for one nice thing. You don't have to disclose all of your background support for that thing. This is not a financial disclosure where you have to disclose everything. You can just omit the part about conservatives being gullible. It's still truthful. Because you were only asked for one nice thing.</quote> I think the issue we're having is that you believe Hillary should have to lie in order to appease easily-offended conservative snowflakes, whereas I don't think she should have lowered herself to lie and claim a vile human being has any positive qualities. Like, where does the line stop for you in terms of who is, and who isn't, worthy of that kind of respect? John Wayne Gacy? Osama Bin Laden? Adolf Hitler? I know I'm being hyperbolic, but my point is...where is your line for the point where we stop coddling deplorable (sorry to trigger you) assholes by telling them they're not ALL bad? --- Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier. Inviso</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1