LogFAQs > #914682481

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicColorado bakers are back in court, but this time over a transgender cake order.
TrevorBlack79
12/25/18 8:12:57 AM
#405:


Nick_Saban posted...
"You said something we dont like aka something in opposition to our liberal agenda so you dont get basic american rights"


Again, this is literally not happening and I invite you to demonstrate otherwise.

Nick_Saban posted...
"You aren't worth engaging further" translates to "I can't really argue any of the legitimate valid points you made but I'm going to bow out in a way that I can maintain a smug sense of superiority"


No, it means you're trying to feed me literal conspiracy theories about hate speech laws that don't exist and have nothing to do with the case this topic is about. You lost that argument and have moved on to claiming there are hate speech laws for some insane reason. There aren't. Hate speech laws are a blatant violation of the First and on the few occasions that someone tries to pass speech-restricting laws of any kind (hint - conservatives have tried it, too) the USSC rightfully slaps it down.

Which "hate speech" law did the Colorado baker violate?
---
"a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1