Yeah the gross-dick brigade loves talking about how their dicks aren't gross.
I don't think any anti-circumcision people here mentioned, or care what a dick looks like, cut or not. The cut-boys are the ones who are obsessed with the look of their (and other men's) penises.
The only point we are arguing is that it's not right to circumcise and infant who can't give consent, unless the procedure is needed to treat, reverse or improve a medical condition.
The main argument I see from cut-boys is "but mine's sexy" "smeggy dick" and "women, or nurses may or may not find it repulsive". Also the denial that your parents robbed you of your foreskin.
Here's a reality check though. Women pretty much find all penises weird and/or gross looking.
That was on ARE...
Anyway, the reason I also dont like the let them choose is because by not getting them circumcised, you basically are choosing for them to not be circumcised. Mainly because if they arent circumcised already, when they get older they most likely wont want to. Not because of all the reasons you all have been mentioning. But I think the main reason will be because nobody wants to change the dick they grow up with. Most circumcised people like their penis. Just like how most uncircumcised guys like theirs. The next biggest reason would probably be the pain of the surgery. Which Im glad I dont remember. Which is because I was a baby when it happened.
But thats why I dont like the let them choose thing. Because, in the end, its almost like theyre still choosing. Its just their choosing to keep you uncircumcised. Thats just how I feel about it...
By not choosing, the child has a choice if they want. By doing it, you deny them the option. If they won't do it by choice, maybe it's entirely unnecessary and making your child suffer unnecessarily?
Your argument is simply "I like cut up dicks so I won't let my son have one I wouldn't personally suck" and that's gross. ---
Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas.