LogFAQs > #912192005

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Do X-Men (2000), X2, Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 still hold up well?
Skye Reynolds 11/10/18 11:01:43 PM #13:	X-Men didn't hold up when it came out. It was a dull, dreary, pretentious mess that was highlighted only by Hugh Jackman's Wolverine. I watched X2, said to myself, "That was better than the first one... and it was still boring," and haven't watched an X-Men movie since. I gave Van Helsing a second try. (It didn't pay off.) Maybe I should give X-Men the same courtesy. Hugh Jackman is a likable enough actor. I'm sure I'll see him in a good movie someday. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:912192005] in Do X-Men (... [t:77190560]...</cite> <quote>X-Men didn't hold up when it came out. It was a dull, dreary, pretentious mess that was highlighted only by Hugh Jackman's Wolverine. I watched X2, said to myself, "That was better than the first one... and it was still boring," and haven't watched an X-Men movie since. I gave Van Helsing a second try. (It didn't pay off.) Maybe I should give X-Men the same courtesy. Hugh Jackman is a likable enough actor. I'm sure I'll see him in a good movie someday.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1