LogFAQs > #912042546

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Chinese guy wants censorship on youtube etc (public platforms)
Kappa02 11/08/18 10:22:38 AM #16:	faramir77 posted... Kappa02 posted... So if neo nazis ran stuff... and they remove your stuff even though the constitution has freedom of speech. By that definition its ok? Yes, because freedom of speech does NOT apply to corporations. GameFAQs can remove any comment you make if it breaks their rules. GameFAQs is not a government. Secondly, neo-Nazis DO run stuff. There are many neo-Nazi websites. If those websites are created in a country where they are allowed to express those opinions, they can. And if the website is theirs, they are allowed to remove whatever anyone else posts on their website. Just like how Alex Jones is completely allowed to own his own website. Kappa02 posted... United Kingdom nowadays seems more to go towards communism (in definition of online control), atleast how the media and stuff seems to be going towards. The small percent of flamboyant SJW in England is a thing though not sure if they are a huge majority You're absolutely insane if you think any of that is true. Open your eyes, man, come on. Kappa02 posted... Edit: Btw we are not talking about some random homemade website here. This is a world wide known brand that is suppose to be internationally for everyone. What is the difference between a "random homemade website" and a massive "world wide known brand"? Is there a certain point where a website stops being a random homemade website? You realize even Facebook started that way, right? The guy on the left in the video makes an immensely stupid connection between Youtube taking down Alex Jones "without a trial" (lmfao) and the government throwing someone in jail without evidence or a trial. It's like he thinks Youtube is a government or something. Neo nazi sites are usually banned though because it is incitement. So realistically it is a reason why some content is banned. Just like communism is a failed ideology. Either case. Point is banning unpopular views is censorship if its a known public platform. But although this does raise a good point that if this becomes.. a thing with monopoly companies. They can make alternative sites and see if they can outsmart the modern companies. But it is sad since this is gonna become more of a echochamber and not try to challenge the opposite. Like what you are saying is just flat out partisan way of dealing with stuff, the cowardly way. But they can, but its not good thing to win. Since now it makes them look like they have zero answer to that stuff and that they are more or less too weak to even have convincing compelling arguments. There exists other alternatives though they are not popular than current ones Minds.com = Facebook Bit Chute.com (Its written singular but GameFaqs is gonna mistake this for a curse word) = YouTube Gab.ai = Twitter voat.co = Reddit One criticism is... right wingers can be insanely annoying after awhile. But the principle is good. https://pics.onsizzle.com/censorship-or-free-speech-legacy-modern-minds-brave-facebook-minds-com-35545066.png <cite>Kappa02 posted [p:912042546] in Chinese gu... [t:77182509]...</cite> <quote><cite>faramir77 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kappa02 posted...</cite> <quote>So if neo nazis ran stuff... and they remove your stuff even though the constitution has freedom of speech. By that definition its ok?</quote> Yes, because freedom of speech does NOT apply to corporations. GameFAQs can remove any comment you make if it breaks their rules. GameFAQs is not a government. Secondly, neo-Nazis DO run stuff. There are many neo-Nazi websites. If those websites are created in a country where they are allowed to express those opinions, they can. And if the website is theirs, they are allowed to remove whatever anyone else posts on their website. Just like how Alex Jones is completely allowed to own his own website. <cite>Kappa02 posted...</cite> <quote>United Kingdom nowadays seems more to go towards communism (in definition of online control), atleast how the media and stuff seems to be going towards. The small percent of flamboyant SJW in England is a thing though not sure if they are a huge majority</quote> You're absolutely insane if you think any of that is true. Open your eyes, man, come on. <cite>Kappa02 posted...</cite> <quote>Edit: Btw we are not talking about some random homemade website here. This is a world wide known brand that is suppose to be internationally for everyone.</quote> What is the difference between a "random homemade website" and a massive "world wide known brand"? Is there a certain point where a website stops being a random homemade website? You realize even Facebook started that way, right? The guy on the left in the video makes an immensely stupid connection between Youtube taking down Alex Jones "without a trial" (lmfao) and the government throwing someone in jail without evidence or a trial. It's like he thinks Youtube is a government or something.</quote> Neo nazi sites are usually banned though because it is incitement. So realistically it is a reason why some content is banned. Just like communism is a failed ideology. Either case. Point is banning unpopular views is censorship if its a known public platform. But although this does raise a good point that if this becomes.. a thing with monopoly companies. They can make alternative sites and see if they can outsmart the modern companies. But it is sad since this is gonna become more of a echochamber and not try to challenge the opposite. Like what you are saying is just flat out partisan way of dealing with stuff, the cowardly way. But they can, but its not good thing to win. Since now it makes them look like they have zero answer to that stuff and that they are more or less too weak to even have convincing compelling arguments. There exists other alternatives though they are not popular than current ones Minds.com = Facebook Bit Chute.com (Its written singular but GameFaqs is gonna mistake this for a curse word) = YouTube Gab.ai = Twitter voat.co = Reddit One criticism is... right wingers can be insanely annoying after awhile. But the principle is good. https://pics.onsizzle.com/censorship-or-free-speech-legacy-modern-minds-brave-facebook-minds-com-35545066.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1