LogFAQs > #910905976

From what i have seen he doesnt so much as push the seth rich stuff as not outright denounce it or refuse to cover it/listen to other people talk about it.

He definitely does toe the line of conspiracy nut though, which makes it difficult because some of the things he toes the line on are fairly reasonable. Like his wariness to accept us intelligence agency information on the russia shit, when we know those agencies have in recent history lied to the public (iraq, and at best it was terribly wrong information if not outright lies which is only somewhat better). He likes to play clips of mueller testifying about that iraq information.

I'm not saying I agree with what he says on that subject, but it is very interesting and not an unreasonable point to make.

As far as tulsi goes, I would honestly prefer tulsi to bernie. She comes across I think as a lot more well rounded and eloquent. Bernie has his script and he beats it into the ground. Tulsi feels more dynamic. Let's not pretend bernie doesn't have some questionable foreign policy positions too.

I'm not sure she would be my first choice, but I would take her over sanders or warren probably. At least on a personal level. Realistically, sanders or warren have the most name recognition and warren just shot herself in the foot so there goes that.
---

[various robot sounds]