LogFAQs > #909975054

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	San Francisco police targeted only black residents in drug arrests
UnfairRepresent 10/04/18 9:04:01 PM #90:	Kastrada posted... It's just logical if other people and other races aren't being arrested or doing the same amount of time, then it's an imbalance of justice. If you say so. 1. I don't think arresting criminals is an inbalance of justice. 2. The lawsuit is about racial profiling and the evidence of that is sketchy at best. 3. There's to my knowledge no evidence that the Asian chick did the same crime that the 37 drug dealers did. If you watch the video the Asian chick didn't sell them anything and the undercover guy was dismissive of what she was selling. Then bought crack from the black lady. In the lawsuit they're claiming the undercover cop "Refused to Engage" with the Asian lady but if you watch the video that simply isn't true. He askes for the Good shit, the Asian lady backs off and the black lady sells him crack. I don't know this but I see no reason to assume the Asian chick wasn't selling weed considering she hung around as he bought shit from the black lady withou saying shit. Meanwhile even the cilents and lawyer making the lawsuit have no knowledge whatsoever on what cops were involved in the investigation, targeting and arrest of the 37 drug dealers apart from 2 of people the in the one video. Despite the cops stating 46 officers were involved and the entire point of the sting was targeting dealers who were dealing crack around schools. Which none of the dealers are contending. The lawsuit is silly on paper. It wants to me to sympathize with crack dealers who aren't even claiming to be innocent (which I respect BTW) dealing around schools. And then assumes that despite their guilt and the fact they were doing it, its wrong to arrest them because they are all black. That's a bad attitude. And "This woman wasn't arrested" I agree is bad, she should be. But I think it's pure speculation to call that racism. It sounds like sexism to me, and that's before you get into the fact she didn't do what the people who were arrested did. Kastrada posted... I did though. I feel they should be in jail. But I also think that it sends up some red flags when only black people were arrested. Why? They were all drug dealers. None of them are even denying it. 25 plead guilty and 12 plead racism. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909975054] in San Franci... [t:77067892]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kastrada posted...</cite> <quote> It's just logical if other people and other races aren't being arrested or doing the same amount of time, then it's an imbalance of justice.</quote> If you say so. 1. I don't think arresting criminals is an inbalance of justice. 2. The lawsuit is about racial profiling and the evidence of that is sketchy at best. 3. There's to my knowledge no evidence that the Asian chick did the same crime that the 37 drug dealers did. If you watch the video the Asian chick didn't sell them anything and the undercover guy was dismissive of what she was selling. Then bought crack from the black lady. In the lawsuit they're claiming the undercover cop "Refused to Engage" with the Asian lady but if you watch the video that simply isn't true. He askes for the Good shit, the Asian lady backs off and the black lady sells him crack. I don't know this but I see no reason to assume the Asian chick wasn't selling weed considering she hung around as he bought shit from the black lady withou saying shit. Meanwhile even the cilents and lawyer making the lawsuit have no knowledge whatsoever on what cops were involved in the investigation, targeting and arrest of the 37 drug dealers apart from 2 of people the in the one video. Despite the cops stating 46 officers were involved and the entire point of the sting was targeting dealers who were dealing crack around schools. Which none of the dealers are contending. The lawsuit is silly on paper. It wants to me to sympathize with crack dealers who aren't even claiming to be innocent (which I respect BTW) dealing around schools. And then assumes that despite their guilt and the fact they were doing it, its wrong to arrest them because they are all black. That's a bad attitude. And "This woman wasn't arrested" I agree is bad, she should be. But I think it's pure speculation to call that racism. It sounds like sexism to me, and that's before you get into the fact she didn't do what the people who were arrested did. <cite>Kastrada posted...</cite> <quote> I did though. I feel they should be in jail. But I also think that it sends up some red flags when only black people were arrested. </quote> Why? They were all drug dealers. None of them are even denying it. 25 plead guilty and 12 plead racism. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1