LogFAQs > #909581555

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Is nobody watching the Kavanugh stream?
darkknight109 09/28/18 12:05:10 AM #58:	OhhhJa posted... Surprise surprise. Immediately resorting to personal attacks again and related to another user at that. Well done! Just saying, I've never seen you post anything but conservative views, so hard for me to believe that denial.... OhhhJa posted... You accused me of being upset but honestly you sound far more upset my dude You could have saved yourself some typing and just posted the "NO U" picture, if the extent of your argument was "I'm not mad, you're mad!" OhhhJa posted... So you dont agree that attacking someone's character is poor argument form? I didn't realise calling someone "conservative" was an attack on their character. If you want to see an attack on character... OhhhJa posted... I did at least consider you more intelligent than that. ...this is an excellent example. Don't let the cognitive dissonance distract you from your argument, though... OhhhJa posted... The latest fad... the "he's famous now" argument despite the fact that he's been well known and in positions of power for years. I literally had never heard the name "Brett Kavanaugh" before he was nominated to the Supreme Court. I think you're vastly overestimating how "well known" he was prior to this year. OhhhJa posted... Fair. But there have still been plenty of false accusations and it's more suspicious when its someone in a position of power with a more immediate threat to the Democrats power. I've never seen concrete numbers on this, but do you have anything to back up the allegation that accusations against famous people and/or politicians are more likely to be fabrications? Because we have dozens of example - against people in both parties - of politicians being accused of sex crimes where the allegations turned out to be completely true. OhhhJa posted... Sorry bud but it looks like the alleged therapist notes and polygraph test have not been turned over to anyone so that is speculation. Incorrect. The Washington Post was provided the excerpts of the therapist notes that detail the rape accusation. Ford could not remember whether she had provided the notes or just summarized them, but the Post clarified that the notes were turned over. As for the polygraph, the report detailing it was submitted and accepted by the Republicans (who were asking pointed questions about who paid for it). To your next point, honestly I don't put much stock in polygraph results because they're not ironclad and they can be fooled by someone who knows what they're doing. That said, the overall point there was that Ford has invited more investigation and oversight, which is not behaviour I would expect out of someone to pass off a lie ("How dare you doubt my story!" would be the liar's expected response). --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:909581555] in Is nobody ... [t:77045787]...</cite> <quote><cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Surprise surprise. Immediately resorting to personal attacks again and related to another user at that. Well done!</quote> Just saying, I've never seen you post anything but conservative views, so hard for me to believe that denial.... <cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>You accused me of being upset but honestly you sound far more upset my dude</quote> You could have saved yourself some typing and just posted the "NO U" picture, if the extent of your argument was "I'm not mad, you're mad!" <cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>So you dont agree that attacking someone's character is poor argument form? </quote> I didn't realise calling someone "conservative" was an attack on their character. If you want to see an attack on character... <cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote> I did at least consider you more intelligent than that.</quote> ...this is an excellent example. Don't let the cognitive dissonance distract you from your argument, though... <cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>The latest fad... the "he's famous now" argument despite the fact that he's been well known and in positions of power for years.</quote> I literally had never heard the name "Brett Kavanaugh" before he was nominated to the Supreme Court. I think you're vastly overestimating how "well known" he was prior to this year. <cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Fair. But there have still been plenty of false accusations and it's more suspicious when its someone in a position of power with a more immediate threat to the Democrats power. </quote> I've never seen concrete numbers on this, but do you have anything to back up the allegation that accusations against famous people and/or politicians are more likely to be fabrications? Because we have dozens of example - against people in both parties - of politicians being accused of sex crimes where the allegations turned out to be completely true. <cite>OhhhJa posted...</cite> <quote>Sorry bud but it looks like the alleged therapist notes and polygraph test have not been turned over to anyone so that is speculation. </quote> Incorrect. The Washington Post was provided the excerpts of the therapist notes that detail the rape accusation. Ford could not remember whether she had provided the notes or just summarized them, but the Post clarified that the notes were turned over. As for the polygraph, the report detailing it was submitted and accepted by the Republicans (who were asking pointed questions about who paid for it). To your next point, honestly I don't put much stock in polygraph results because they're not ironclad and they can be fooled by someone who knows what they're doing. That said, the overall point there was that Ford has invited more investigation and oversight, which is not behaviour I would expect out of someone to pass off a lie ("How dare you doubt my story!" would be the liar's expected response). --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1