LogFAQs > #908776438

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicCongressman goes full Mal_Fet
Giant_Aspirin
09/14/18 9:57:03 PM
#213:


Mal_Fet posted...
When it comes to authoritarians, there's no actual difference between "the state" and "the people" because the state will always assume that its interests are what's best for the people. Hitler genuinely believed that what he did was for the good of the people, like Stalin did.


thats exactly my point, and that's why Socialism isn't authoritarian. by definition, it means "social ownership", and ownership implies a share of the proceeds. under Socialism the people get a share of the profits, but under Authoritarianism, it all goes to the authority/State/government.

and re-read the quote i put up there, in #210, Hitler definitely didn't believe the goal was to benefit "the people".
---
Playing: Dead Cells; Xenoblade 2; Mario Odyssey
(~);} - I suppose it will all make sense when we grow up - {;(~)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1