Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | Do Richard Spencer and other Neo-Nazis deserve to be punched? |
ScazarMeltex 08/18/18 11:56:01 AM #93: | UnfairRepresent posted... ScazarMeltex posted...Payzmaykr posted...No. They deserve to be ignored. There is never any circumstance in which words constitute a violent response. That speaks for the character of the person involved. No it's a way to remind people that tolerance of everything leads to intolerance running the show, i'm not surprised that you aren't smart to understand that. Here perhaps is something you might actually grasp. And so, I established in 1919 a programme and tendency that was a conscious slap in the face of the democratic-pacifist world. [We knew] it might take five or ten or twenty years, yet gradually an authoritarian state arose within the democratic state, and a nucleus of fanatical devotion and ruthless determination formed in a wretched world that lacked basic convictions. Only one danger could have jeopardised this development if our adversaries had understood its principle, established a clear understanding of our ideas, and not offered any resistance. Or, alternatively, if they had from the first day annihilated with the utmost brutality the nucleus of our new movement. Neither was done. The times were such that our adversaries were no longer capable of accomplishing our annihilation, nor did they have the nerve. Arguably, they furthermore lacked the understanding to assume a wholly appropriate attitude. Instead, they began to tyrannise our young movement by bourgeois means, and, by doing so, they assisted the process of natural selection in a very fortunate manner. From there on, it was only a question of time until the leadership of the nation would fall to our hardened human material." Adolf Hitler: Die Reden Hitlers am Reichsparteitag 1933, --- "If you wish to converse with me define your terms" Voltaire ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |