LogFAQs > #905699486

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	My friend told a woman, "fuck her and her ugly ass children."
Kyuubi4269 07/25/18 1:27:36 PM #185:	darkknight109 posted... you claiming that the family was probably thrown out Never happened lol darkknight109 posted... the burden of proof lies with you that it happened; since you have none, the default assumption is that the family remained. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. There is no assumption, neither are appropriate to assume. darkknight109 posted... If I were to claim that the friend got in a fist fight with the family and you claimed that didn't happen, those two claims would not be equally valid, despite the fact that the OP does not mention whether a fist fight did or did not happen. It would be up to me to prove that a fist-fight happened, which I would be unable to do, so the default assumption is that no physical altercation took place. That only applies when you present any evidence at all, even heresay. When no evidence supports either side, the assumption is nobody knows. darkknight109 posted... Had he not sworn in front of a bunch of kids, she would not have spoken in the first place. Seriously, follow your lines of logic to their conclusion. She didn't have to do anything, in fact she had to leave him alone. darkknight109 posted... a) Yes there is, if you're doing it in front of kids b) There's also nothing wrong with politely asking someone not to swear in front of children a) Your morals aren't in line with your society b) There is something wrong with bothering strangers over your personal morals, we dislike Jehova's Witnesses for a reason c) Letters are for addressing different issues, numbers address different elements; please use these to suit my beliefs in future. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:905699486] in My friend ... [t:76821379]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>you claiming that the family was probably thrown out</quote> Never happened lol <cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>the burden of proof lies with you that it happened; since you have none, the default assumption is that the family remained.</quote> Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. There is no assumption, neither are appropriate to assume. <cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>If I were to claim that the friend got in a fist fight with the family and you claimed that didn't happen, those two claims would not be equally valid, despite the fact that the OP does not mention whether a fist fight did or did not happen. It would be up to me to prove that a fist-fight happened, which I would be unable to do, so the default assumption is that no physical altercation took place.</quote> That only applies when you present any evidence at all, even heresay. When no evidence supports either side, the assumption is nobody knows. <cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Had he not sworn in front of a bunch of kids, she would not have spoken in the first place. Seriously, follow your lines of logic to their conclusion.</quote> She didn't have to do anything, in fact she had to leave him alone. <cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>a) Yes there is, if you're doing it in front of kids b) There's also nothing wrong with politely asking someone not to swear in front of children</quote> a) Your morals aren't in line with your society b) There is something wrong with bothering strangers over your personal morals, we dislike Jehova's Witnesses for a reason c) Letters are for addressing different issues, numbers address different elements; please use these to suit my beliefs in future. --- Scloud posted... Its like he wants two things at the same time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1