LogFAQs > #904394833

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why does the Jurassic World franchise want to sell 'weaponized dinos' so bad.
adjl 07/02/18 11:08:50 PM #35:	Revelation34 posted... ForteEXE3850 posted... The writers just kind of wanted weaponized dinosaurs in the movies and didn't care if it made sense. They keep talking about the ethical implications of using dinosaurs for combat but don't talk about how ineffective and impractical it is. But the ethics discussion has no weight since what they claim is unethical makes no sense to be doing in the first place. How would it even be unethical anyway since they're all dead and just cloned from DNA? Clones are no less alive than the original organisms would be. There's no reason to consider them distinct from naturally-generated animals for ethical purposes. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:904394833] in Why does t... [t:76766754]...</cite> <quote><cite>Revelation34 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ForteEXE3850 posted...</cite> <quote>The writers just kind of wanted weaponized dinosaurs in the movies and didn't care if it made sense. They keep talking about the ethical implications of using dinosaurs for combat but don't talk about how ineffective and impractical it is. But the ethics discussion has no weight since what they claim is unethical makes no sense to be doing in the first place.</quote> How would it even be unethical anyway since they're all dead and just cloned from DNA?</quote> Clones are no less alive than the original organisms would be. There's no reason to consider them distinct from naturally-generated animals for ethical purposes. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1