LogFAQs > #904129589

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Chris' political topic. Where Chris posts super casually about political stuff.
DoomTheGyarados 06/28/18 1:27:57 PM #16:	Suprak the Stud posted... DoomTheGyarados posted... The problem isn't democrat vs republican it is the fact that much of both parties are bought and paid for. And sure, money talks 'fair' but... they aren't serving the American people :/ Well the case you're referring to broke 5-4 along ideological lines. I know people like to default to the "but both sides" thing, but this is one clear instance where one side is demonstrably worse than the other on the issue you're arguing for. Not that big money in politics isn't an issue on the democratic side as well, but it is just less of an issue at the moment. Yeah but I am not sure if the guy Obama would have appointed would have not made it 5-4 is all I am saying. --- Sir Chris <cite>DoomTheGyarados posted [p:904129589] in Chris' pol... [t:76758633]...</cite> <quote><cite>Suprak the Stud posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DoomTheGyarados posted...</cite> <quote>The problem isn't democrat vs republican it is the fact that much of both parties are bought and paid for. And sure, money talks 'fair' but... they aren't serving the American people :/</quote> Well the case you're referring to broke 5-4 along ideological lines. I know people like to default to the "but both sides" thing, but this is one clear instance where one side is demonstrably worse than the other on the issue you're arguing for. Not that big money in politics isn't an issue on the democratic side as well, but it is just less of an issue at the moment.</quote> Yeah but I am not sure if the guy Obama would have appointed would have not made it 5-4 is all I am saying. --- Sir Chris</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1