So it's not worth making the deal until they are actually testing or what? What the fuck sort of logic is that, what happened to "ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure"?
Not really, especially if the narrative you guys give that they NEVER were developing nukes in the first place is true.
That's like paying me off to not make nukes when I'm not even making them. It's dumb.
But we all know that that narrative isn't true at all. It's still a bad deal. We shouldn't have to pay countries not to be shit heads.
And what kind of fucking logic is there in actively ignoring an actual country with nukes like you guys seem to do? Maybe we should just pay Kim a bunch of money and hope he doesn't make any either then?
According to Democrats, Iraq had WMDs when Clinton bombed them in the late 90s but not when Bush Jr was in power.
Iraq didn't have WMD. You still believe the lies that got us into Iraq after all these years? ---