LogFAQs > #902386888

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why is Solo considered a failure?
TommyG663513 06/01/18 5:25:21 PM #44:	Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... The funny thing is that I bet you anything the Phil Lord and Chris Miller version of the film would have performed better. Well it would have at least cost a lot less to use that version of the film. They reshot an awful lot of the film. They say about 70% of it. Though they also say that a very large portion of the footage Lord and Miller shot was completely unusable. IDK, but it sounds like Kathleen Kennedy should have done a better job hiring a director who would make the movie she wanted to make. This isn't the first time there has been director issues with her SW movies. --- just tell them all your base doesn't belong to us because we were getting stoned...they'll understand-Ken156 <cite>TommyG663513 posted [p:902386888] in Why is Sol... [t:76665543]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted...</cite> <quote>The funny thing is that I bet you anything the Phil Lord and Chris Miller version of the film would have performed better.</quote> Well it would have at least cost a lot less to use that version of the film. They reshot an awful lot of the film. They say about 70% of it. Though they also say that a very large portion of the footage Lord and Miller shot was completely unusable. IDK, but it sounds like Kathleen Kennedy should have done a better job hiring a director who would make the movie she wanted to make. This isn't the first time there has been director issues with her SW movies. --- just tell them all your base doesn't belong to us because we were getting stoned...they'll understand-Ken156</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1