LogFAQs > #900470772

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Who created this "toxic masculinity" narrative?
IfGodCouldDie 04/28/18 4:52:58 PM #82:	Funbazooka posted... SGT_Conti posted... hockeybub89 posted... Offworlder1 posted... Radical feminists who hate men created the concept of toxic masculinity. Toxic is an adjective that modifies masculinity. If it meant the very concept of man is toxic, then why would there be a need to be a qualifier? I think this is the important thing many people seem to miss. Toxic masculinity is something entirely separate from just masculinity. What is deemed toxic masculinity changes from feminist to feminist. The more extreme ones will demonize even positive masculine traits. Others will say those traits are indirectly toxic when men blame themselves for not being something. It's subjective even within the feminist ranks. There's no scientific consensus there. Gender studies is far from being a science. I remember seeing something along the lines of having facial hair was oppressive to women because they can't grow it. I don't remember if it was satirical or not, mainly because it's not out of the realm of possibility to be believed by some people. --- Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes <cite>IfGodCouldDie posted [p:900470772] in Who create... [t:76560625]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SGT_Conti posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Offworlder1 posted...</cite> <quote>Radical feminists who hate men created the concept of toxic masculinity.</quote> Toxic is an adjective that modifies masculinity. If it meant the very concept of man is toxic, then why would there be a need to be a qualifier?</quote> I think this is the important thing many people seem to miss. Toxic masculinity is something entirely separate from just masculinity.</quote> What is deemed toxic masculinity changes from feminist to feminist. The more extreme ones will demonize even positive masculine traits. Others will say those traits are indirectly toxic when men blame themselves for not being something. It's subjective even within the feminist ranks. There's no scientific consensus there. Gender studies is far from being a science.</quote> I remember seeing something along the lines of having facial hair was oppressive to women because they can't grow it. I don't remember if it was satirical or not, mainly because it's not out of the realm of possibility to be believed by some people. --- Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1