LogFAQs > #898774500

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topici hate how people keep comparing slyvannas to garrosh
ThePrinceFish
03/30/18 3:21:31 PM
#9:


_BlueMonk posted...
all she did in legion was this story line where she tried to steal this lantern thingy from the vrykul and enslave them so she can live forever (the vrykul are like those dead angel things arthas had but uh.. good? they're golden). but then genn greymane stops her cuz he's still mad about his son dying back in cata.

I remember this now. The Forsaken require the Val'kyr because without the Lich King raising new undead which the Forsaken can free and bolster their population, Sylvanas's Val'kyr are the only beings that can raise new Forsaken.

Pretty sure the sacrificing Val'kyr in her place when she dies is just a nice side bonus.

Like I said, Sylvanas does what she has to to ensure the future and growth of the Forsaken. It's not nice, but they are a race of forcibly turned zombie people.

I wonder if she would still allow the Blood Elves to survive or if she would rather they were all Forsaken elves in a perfect world. Usually the Blood Elves are the only living beings Sylvanas doesn't seem to disdain.
---
Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that."
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1