LogFAQs > #898727279

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Laura Ingraham apologizes to David Hogg after advertisers dropped her show.
Howl 03/29/18 6:31:33 PM #125:	Blue_Inigo posted... Howl posted... Blue_Inigo posted... Howl posted... byron posted... There's some seriously buttmad righties ITT Big lol at the conspiracy theorist who thinks that the kid didn't even go to the school I'm not one of them, and I said way earlier in the topic that she was a total fucking idiot for saying that. I don't believe crazy conspiracy theories about him or anything. His response just seemed very cowardly imo. There's nothing cowardly about calling out the half assed response apology of a moron Him hiding behind "I'm just a child" is extremely cowardly. Lol are you kidding me? A grown ass woman is picking fights with a kid. Of course he's gonna point that out. That aint cowardly. If anyone is cowardly, it's this foolish woman. He's not a kid. He's a 17 year old teenager, and by all accounts a very intelligent one. There's a very clear separation between him and like a 6 year old or something. He's less than a year from being an adult. The line between 17 and 18 isn't like a person magically becomes instantly more mature over night, so for the purposes of this argument the distinction is essentially meaningless. He has chosen willingly to be a part of public adult life and with that comes the responsibility of getting criticized by people, even for incredibly stupid reasons like this. Part of being an adult is learning how to effectively deal with that criticism, which I don't believe he did by saying "I'm just a kid though!!!!1!1!1!!1!" All that being said both sides here said stupid things imo with Laura Ingraham being obviously more wrong. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Howl posted [p:898727279] in Laura Ingr... [t:76465263]...</cite> <quote><cite>Blue_Inigo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Blue_Inigo posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>byron posted...</cite> <quote> There's some seriously buttmad righties ITT Big lol at the conspiracy theorist who thinks that the kid didn't even go to the school </quote> I'm not one of them, and I said way earlier in the topic that she was a total fucking idiot for saying that. I don't believe crazy conspiracy theories about him or anything. His response just seemed very cowardly imo. </quote> There's nothing cowardly about calling out the half assed response apology of a moron </quote> Him hiding behind "I'm just a child" is extremely cowardly.</quote> Lol are you kidding me? A grown ass woman is picking fights with a kid. Of course he's gonna point that out. That aint cowardly. If anyone is cowardly, it's this foolish woman.</quote> He's not a kid. He's a 17 year old teenager, and by all accounts a very intelligent one. There's a very clear separation between him and like a 6 year old or something. He's less than a year from being an adult. The line between 17 and 18 isn't like a person magically becomes instantly more mature over night, so for the purposes of this argument the distinction is essentially meaningless. He has chosen willingly to be a part of public adult life and with that comes the responsibility of getting criticized by people, even for incredibly stupid reasons like this. Part of being an adult is learning how to effectively deal with that criticism, which I don't believe he did by saying "I'm just a kid though!!!!1!1!1!!1!" All that being said both sides here said stupid things imo with Laura Ingraham being obviously more wrong. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1