LogFAQs > #897345980

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Swedish court follows Islamic law.
NINExATExSEVEN 03/07/18 3:07:44 PM #76:	hockeybub89 posted... NINExATExSEVEN posted... hockeybub89 posted... 987 supposedly would not be constantly outraged over the loss of pure cultures if every culture was diverse like America and Canada, though even those countries weren't always as diverse as they are now. It's pure coincidence he only makes these arguments for predominately white countries, erroneously equating skin color with cultural homogeny. He would totally make the same argument to defend backwards Middle Eastern shitholes staying the way they are because they have a history and culture to save. You forget that America and Canada have always been diverse. They STARTED off diverse so nobody can lay claim to these countries. They are also young countries. White European countries have been ethnicity European for thousands of years. So have most Asian and African and middle eastern countries. Outside of invasion, the demographics of homogenous countries never changed much at all. So you can't tell Europe and Asia to play by American and Canadian standards of multiculturalism when their individual identity is based off of homogeneity while ours is based on diversity. Yes I can because I am. You're also forgetting America only happened due to white Europeans destroying native culture and then those same whites long fought against diversity. "America was always diverse" is a misnomer. "It's always been like that" is a terrible argument that people only use when they agree with something. Does a place like the Middle East really need to maintain its cultural homogeny? Why do they need to stay homogenous? And are countries in Europe really homogenous? Or are they just predominately white? If two white people have polar opposite political iews and share no hobbies, are they really of the same culture? No, no country needs to remain homogeneous. No country needs to remain racially or ethnically homogeneous. But what if they want to? What if they like the way they are and just don't want to go down Americas and Canada's level of diversity? What then? Do we respect their rights as the citizens of their country, or do we demonize them and try to intimidate them to adopt our multicultural ideology? --- Listen to my story... This... May be our last chance... <cite>NINExATExSEVEN posted [p:897345980] in Swedish co... [t:76389144]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>NINExATExSEVEN posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>987 supposedly would not be constantly outraged over the loss of pure cultures if every culture was diverse like America and Canada, though even those countries weren't always as diverse as they are now. It's pure coincidence he only makes these arguments for predominately white countries, erroneously equating skin color with cultural homogeny. He would totally make the same argument to defend backwards Middle Eastern shitholes staying the way they are because they have a history and culture to save.</quote> You forget that America and Canada have always been diverse. They STARTED off diverse so nobody can lay claim to these countries. They are also young countries. White European countries have been ethnicity European for thousands of years. So have most Asian and African and middle eastern countries. Outside of invasion, the demographics of homogenous countries never changed much at all. So you can't tell Europe and Asia to play by American and Canadian standards of multiculturalism when their individual identity is based off of homogeneity while ours is based on diversity.</quote> Yes I can because I am. You're also forgetting America only happened due to white Europeans destroying native culture and then those same whites long fought against diversity. "America was always diverse" is a misnomer. "It's always been like that" is a terrible argument that people only use when they agree with something. Does a place like the Middle East really need to maintain its cultural homogeny? Why do they need to stay homogenous? And are countries in Europe really homogenous? Or are they just predominately white? If two white people have polar opposite political iews and share no hobbies, are they really of the same culture?</quote> No, no country needs to remain homogeneous. No country needs to remain racially or ethnically homogeneous. But what if they want to? What if they like the way they are and just don't want to go down Americas and Canada's level of diversity? What then? Do we respect their rights as the citizens of their country, or do we demonize them and try to intimidate them to adopt our multicultural ideology? --- Listen to my story... This... May be our last chance...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1