LogFAQs > #896697424

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicITT: A gun-control advocate learns about guns
Tropicalwood
02/24/18 5:15:24 PM
#19:


Dark_Spiret posted...
Mr_Biscuit posted...
So basically there's no such thing as an "assault weapon" in terms of an actual type of gun, it's just a blanket term for scary-looking-thing? I can agree that's way too vague to be applicable in a legal setting.
outside of magazine capacity, yeah basically.
InHobUx
only one of these was on the AWB

Little note on the Mini-14, those were supposed to replace the M14 as a service rifle (they were changing calibers) but Ruger was too slow so the AR15 was reluctantly adopted by the Military because they quite with their ultra light weight barrels made with an aluminum composite that caused them to just barely fail the barrel life.

I say the military was reluctant to adopt the AR platform, because they really didn't like the weapon's ergonomics because they're so vastly different from what they've always used.
---
ayy lmao ayy lmao || oaml oaml yya yya
ayy lmao ayy lmao || oaml oaml yya yya
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1