LogFAQs > #895619931

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	This 13 y/o Ohio Girl was Punished with a BOY HAIRCUT by her DAD!! Look at It!!!
Zeus 02/07/18 2:45:33 AM #22:	VioletMassacre posted... But is she hot? At this point I should remind you that she's 13 >_> (Granted, I think Ducky got warned once for asking if a young girl was hot.) Doctor Foxx posted... It's fucked up to impose your will on someone else's body and image, including forcing them to cut off their hair. It's hair. Part of the body. Sacred in some cultures. It's not like some PlayStation or a skimpy outfit you can take away. That would be devastating for most of the teen girls I've known. Heck I was a teen with short hair. Kids can be shitty, and to deal with that when you didn't even want the look... Terrible controlling parenting with no empathy. It's called "parenting." Parents routinely "impose" their will on their children's appearance, whether it's to stop a child from getting a mohawk or limiting what they can wear. AllstarSniper32 posted... Nah. It's just highlights. And she's 13. she can decide how she wants her hair to look. Parents have discretion until kids are 18. The cutoff isn't 13. Yellow posted... I can't even pinpoint what it is I hate so much about this to the point where it seems like child abuse. You just don't go there. It's like dressing your son up in a dress as punishment. Fucked up. That's a lot worse than this. There are a lot of girls who wear their hair short (especially since celebs have been doing it), whereas there's no good precedent for a guy in a dress which makes it a much stronger case for child abuse. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:895619931] in This 13 y/... [t:76291965]...</cite> <quote><cite>VioletMassacre posted...</cite> <quote>But is she hot?</quote> At this point I should remind you that she's 13 >_> (Granted, I think Ducky got warned once for asking if a young girl was hot.) <cite>Doctor Foxx posted...</cite> <quote>It's fucked up to impose your will on someone else's body and image, including forcing them to cut off their hair. It's hair. Part of the body. Sacred in some cultures. It's not like some PlayStation or a skimpy outfit you can take away. That would be devastating for most of the teen girls I've known. Heck I was a teen with short hair. Kids can be shitty, and to deal with that when you didn't even want the look... Terrible controlling parenting with no empathy.</quote> It's called "parenting." Parents routinely "impose" their will on their children's appearance, whether it's to stop a child from getting a mohawk or limiting what they can wear. <cite>AllstarSniper32 posted...</cite> <quote>Nah. It's just highlights. And she's 13. she can decide how she wants her hair to look.</quote> Parents have discretion until kids are 18. The cutoff isn't 13. <cite>Yellow posted...</cite> <quote>I can't even pinpoint what it is I hate so much about this to the point where it seems like child abuse. You just don't go there. It's like dressing your son up in a dress as punishment. Fucked up.</quote> That's a lot worse than this. There are a lot of girls who wear their hair short (especially since celebs have been doing it), whereas there's no good precedent for a guy in a dress which makes it a much stronger case for child abuse. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1