LogFAQs > #895160575

WastelandCowboy posted...

Zeus posted...

Lackluster rebuttal. Mostly an array of trite talking points, some of which regurgitated from speeches across the past 20 or 30 years while most of the rest was recycled attacks against Trump along with some gutter-tier pandering. Honestly, even Marco "Dry Mouth" Rubio a few years back gave a stronger rebuttal.

Wasn't worth the 13.5 minutes run-time. Also, for a Kennedy, he's damn creepy-looking. The only plus is that this *might* be the last time we hear from Chucky Kennedy after this shitty rebuttal.

I'd love to see your reasoning and sources behind these moronic comments of yours, Zeusy. If not, you're more than welcome to sit on a tack.

Reasoning and sources for what, the fact that he failed to present anything we haven't heard from other boilerplate stump speeches, he didn't heavily recycle attacks on Trump, and he didn't engage in cheaper pandering than a Mick Foley cheap pop? Honestly, if you need sources for *any* of that, it demonstrates that you've paid zero attention to political speeches in recent years which undermines any credibility you might have on political matters. And if you're using hostility to mask your ignorance on the subject, you're not really helping anybody let alone the cause you claim to represent.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.