LogFAQs > #894603617

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	How does Christianity explain the fact that they weren't the first religion?
AlisLandale 01/22/18 10:18:31 PM #112:	Asherlee10 posted... That is another reason why I said and still say, that's terrible and speciest. Okay, allow me to be direct. Why is it terrible? Please explain why it is terrible. Beyond "it's speciest". Asherlee10 posted... RE: Bill Nye and Noah -- I don't think someone would be out of place to debate the happenings of the Bible especially when those that follow its faith propose that those events are true and happened on Earth. If a belief breaks down when applied to the nature of our world and exists, then it's probably time to set that belief aside. That's how we progress in society And real quick because this is a tangent: If you're arguing the probability of Noah, within the framework of the story (Noah wouldn't have had training to build ships), you're arguing under the premise that there is an all-powerful God. That's why the story exists, and it can not exist without God's presence. This was in response to your posts which tried to use human-centricity as some sort of proof of fallacy. Asherlee10 posted... It doesn't logically follow that if we assume a Maker exists that it would focus on only one of its creations. It does logically follow. Because the Maker in question values humans. But that's really just a tangent. Back to the point. Why is it terrible? Please explain why it is terrible. Beyond "it's speciest". --- Currently Binging: Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex http://i.imgtc.com/YQId2Bz.png <cite>AlisLandale posted [p:894603617] in How does C... [t:76231135]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote> That is another reason why I said and still say, that's terrible and speciest. </quote> Okay, allow me to be direct. Why is it terrible? Please explain why it is terrible. Beyond "it's speciest". <cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>RE: Bill Nye and Noah -- I don't think someone would be out of place to debate the happenings of the Bible especially when those that follow its faith propose that those events are true and happened on Earth. If a belief breaks down when applied to the nature of our world and exists, then it's probably time to set that belief aside. That's how we progress in society</quote> And real quick because this is a tangent: If you're arguing the probability of Noah, within the framework of the story (Noah wouldn't have had training to build ships), you're arguing under the premise that there is an all-powerful God. That's why the story exists, and it can not exist without God's presence. This was in response to your posts which tried to use human-centricity as some sort of proof of fallacy. <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>It doesn't logically follow that if we assume a Maker exists that it would focus on only one of its creations.</quote> </quote> It does logically follow. Because the Maker in question values humans. But that's really just a tangent. Back to the point. Why is it terrible? Please explain why it is terrible. Beyond "it's speciest". --- Currently Binging: Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex http://i.imgtc.com/YQId2Bz.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1