LogFAQs > #893017316

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Mainstream media coverage of Trump 3x more negative than Obama; just 5% positive
Balrog0 12/28/17 3:09:23 PM #37:	The Admiral posted... Also twice as negative as the coverage of Bush, whose policies were objectively worse. in the first 60 days was that true, though? I remember bush pursuing fairly bipartisa and mainstream stuff, but I dont remember it that specifically with regard to timeframe because I was like 10 --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:893017316] in Mainstream... [t:76145529]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote>Also twice as negative as the coverage of Bush, whose policies were objectively worse. </quote> in the first 60 days was that true, though? I remember bush pursuing fairly bipartisa and mainstream stuff, but I dont remember it that specifically with regard to timeframe because I was like 10 --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1