LogFAQs > #892443464

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Harry Potter was better before spoilers
AlisLandale 12/18/17 1:10:11 PM #11:	Alucard188 posted... That's the point. Moldybort's revival marked the turning of the series into a dark and moribund story, because there's nothing fun about him. Which i could forgive if Volemort was interesting. But he's not. The most interesting part about Voldemort was his followers. And he doesnt need to be alive or at full power to have them do things. Jeff AKA Snoopy posted... It grew with the audience and tackled issues that were important to that world. It is impressive for a YA series honestly. I'll grant it that. The last three books werent bad. They were just far less interesting. --- Currently Binging: Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex http://i.imgtc.com/YQId2Bz.png <cite>AlisLandale posted [p:892443464] in Harry Pott... [t:76112213]...</cite> <quote><cite>Alucard188 posted...</cite> <quote>That's the point. Moldybort's revival marked the turning of the series into a dark and moribund story, because there's nothing fun about him.</quote> Which i could forgive if Volemort was interesting. But he's not. The most interesting part about Voldemort was his followers. And he doesnt need to be alive or at full power to have them do things. <cite>Jeff AKA Snoopy posted...</cite> <quote>It grew with the audience and tackled issues that were important to that world. It is impressive for a YA series honestly.</quote> I'll grant it that. The last three books werent bad. They were just far less interesting. --- Currently Binging: Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex http://i.imgtc.com/YQId2Bz.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1