LogFAQs > #892442189

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Twitter is finally banning the nazis
The Admiral 12/18/17 12:45:59 PM #44:	Callixtus posted... A private company with that sort of influence should not have this power to limit speech. They aren't qualified to determine what is a hate group or not. And what do they mean by "violent"? It is quite open to interpretation. Banning hate groups from a private platform is not a free speech violation. Those Nazis are allowed to start their own site and say whatever they want. Like I said above, it's not the policy that's the issue, it's that Twitter doesn't always enforce their policies consistently when political ideology is involved. For example: --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:892442189] in Twitter is... [t:76112026]...</cite> <quote><cite>Callixtus posted...</cite> <quote>A private company with that sort of influence should not have this power to limit speech. They aren't qualified to determine what is a hate group or not. And what do they mean by "violent"? It is quite open to interpretation.</quote> Banning hate groups from a private platform is not a free speech violation. Those Nazis are allowed to start their own site and say whatever they want. Like I said above, it's not the policy that's the issue, it's that Twitter doesn't always enforce their policies consistently when political ideology is involved. For example: --- - The Admiral</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1