LogFAQs > #892382690

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	22 y/o woman mauled to death by her own Pitbulls while taking them for a walk
Samurontai 12/17/17 1:57:04 PM #114:	ChromaticAngel posted... Samurontai posted... ChromaticAngel posted... That is to say, when a pit bull wants to kill someone, they are more likely to be successful than any other breed of dog. Not how often they will attempt to kill someone. This is objectively false though, and leads time to believe that you don't know why Pit Bulls are so adept at killing rather than maiming. I don't think you know what the word objectively means. The data on fatal dog attacks proves otherwise. Samurontai posted... Again, how does that necessarily dictate that they have the highest ability to kill? There are several breeds that are more capable of killing than a Pit Bull could ever be, and I can post citations if you want If there were breeds that were more capable of killing people other than pit bulls, then: 1. You're either lying about Pit Bulls being inherently good natured dogs OR 2. There is a massive conspiracy going around specifically to abuse pit bulls and no other dogs No, you're trying to argue two different things. Just because one thing is more commonly used to kill people, doesn't mean that said thing is the most efficient way to kill people. It's such an absurd argument, and yes you are objectively wrong. As for your second part, neither of those two things you just said argue against my point at all. Youre side stepping with a couple of "gotcha" questions, which is why you haven't answered why Pit Bulls have a tendency to kill rather than maim. --- http://i.imgur.com/Scl5rwX.gif http://i.imgur.com/Fjgt7Qq.gif http://i.imgur.com/NidhAni.gif http://i.imgur.com/IGIbQPk.gif <cite>Samurontai posted [p:892382690] in 22 y/o wom... [t:76108500]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChromaticAngel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ChromaticAngel posted...</cite> <quote>That is to say, when a pit bull wants to kill someone, they are more likely to be successful than any other breed of dog. Not how often they will attempt to kill someone.</quote> This is objectively false though, and leads time to believe that you don't know why Pit Bulls are so adept at killing rather than maiming.</quote> I don't think you know what the word objectively means. The data on fatal dog attacks proves otherwise. <cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote>Again, how does that necessarily dictate that they have the highest ability to kill? There are several breeds that are more capable of killing than a Pit Bull could ever be, and I can post citations if you want</quote> If there were breeds that were more capable of killing people other than pit bulls, then: 1. You're either lying about Pit Bulls being inherently good natured dogs OR 2. There is a massive conspiracy going around specifically to abuse pit bulls and no other dogs</quote> No, you're trying to argue two different things. Just because one thing is more commonly used to kill people, doesn't mean that said thing is the most efficient way to kill people. It's such an absurd argument, and yes you are objectively wrong. As for your second part, neither of those two things you just said argue against my point at all. Youre side stepping with a couple of "gotcha" questions, which is why you haven't answered why Pit Bulls have a tendency to kill rather than maim. --- http://i.imgur.com/Scl5rwX.gif http://i.imgur.com/Fjgt7Qq.gif http://i.imgur.com/NidhAni.gif http://i.imgur.com/IGIbQPk.gif</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1