LogFAQs > #891884072

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Police (inevitable) Right or Wrong Topic
Corrik 12/09/17 11:50:28 AM #35:	Inviso posted... Corrik posted... Dancedreamer posted... As I said in the other topic, police need to be held accountable. This was at the very least manslaughter. The officer should be in jail, and have to pay the family a substantial amount of money. This was 100% avoidable. Why is the officer being held accountable for doing as he was probably trained to do but not the victim being held accountable in this situation? Because the victim is DEAD. What more punishment could he possibly receive? Nobody said he should receive more punishment. Nor did anyone say he had to be killed. I said, why isn't the victim being held accountable that the police told him loud and clearly if he did not follow their commands precisely that he would be shot, that he failed to follow those commands, and he was shot due to this. When an officer of the law legally tells you the consequences clearly, and you do something you were told not to in order to bring about those consequences, shouldn't you be held accountable that you reaped those consequences? I mean. Maybe maybe not. But, at the very least, you can see why this would be justified as far as the legal system is concerned. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:891884072] in Police (in... [t:76078430]...</cite> <quote><cite>Inviso posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dancedreamer posted...</cite> <quote>As I said in the other topic, police need to be held accountable. This was at the very least manslaughter. The officer should be in jail, and have to pay the family a substantial amount of money. This was 100% avoidable.</quote> Why is the officer being held accountable for doing as he was probably trained to do but not the victim being held accountable in this situation?</quote> Because the victim is DEAD. What more punishment could he possibly receive?</quote> Nobody said he should receive more punishment. Nor did anyone say he had to be killed. I said, why isn't the victim being held accountable that the police told him loud and clearly if he did not follow their commands precisely that he would be shot, that he failed to follow those commands, and he was shot due to this. When an officer of the law legally tells you the consequences clearly, and you do something you were told not to in order to bring about those consequences, shouldn't you be held accountable that you reaped those consequences? I mean. Maybe maybe not. But, at the very least, you can see why this would be justified as far as the legal system is concerned. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1