LogFAQs > #891510856

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	"Augmented human labor is an inclusive opportunity, not a threat."
FLUFFYGERM 12/03/17 12:45:36 PM #40:	powerman1426 posted... You haven't answered any of the questions tho. What about early retirement penalties, what about decreased social security benefits, what about having to dig into their nest egg? If you're that close to retirement, coast on another job until you retire. It's no different than getting laid off or going through a recession right when you're about to retire. You should be prepared for these possibilities. Learn new things and save money. Maybe the government should take less money out of people's pay checks so that individuals can invest that money themselves? That way we won't be slaves to the government's definition of retirement, and we won't need to work until we're really old in order to see the full weight of our earnings? Nothing you're saying is good enough to justify stunting automation by the way. Are you in favor of not automating just so we can have "muh jobs"? If you're not in favor of that, what is the point of even posting? --- but Marxist theory is extremely consistent, both internally and with reality. -averagejeol <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:891510856] in "Augm... [t:76057385]...</cite> <quote><cite>powerman1426 posted...</cite> <quote> You haven't answered any of the questions tho. What about early retirement penalties, what about decreased social security benefits, what about having to dig into their nest egg?</quote> If you're that close to retirement, coast on another job until you retire. It's no different than getting laid off or going through a recession right when you're about to retire. You should be prepared for these possibilities. Learn new things and save money. Maybe the government should take less money out of people's pay checks so that individuals can invest that money themselves? That way we won't be slaves to the government's definition of retirement, and we won't need to work until we're really old in order to see the full weight of our earnings? Nothing you're saying is good enough to justify stunting automation by the way. Are you in favor of not automating just so we can have "muh jobs"? If you're not in favor of that, what is the point of even posting? --- but Marxist theory is extremely consistent, both internally and with reality. -averagejeol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1