LogFAQs > #891032202

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThe case for Hillary Clinton 2020
Hexenherz
11/25/17 12:53:05 PM
#36:


BLAKUboy posted...
Hexenherz posted...
Someone who ran two failed electoral campaigns is not qualified to be president.

That's a a really weird way of saying "I'm going to ignore all of her qualifications because I just don't like her."
Like I have more than a few complaints about Hillary, but she is without question "legitimately qualified".


I'm not denying she has a lot of experience and is a very qualified candidate because of that.
But she has shown multiple times that she can't manage a campaign budget (do you want someone who can't manage something like that to manage the national budget?), that she is out of touch with the majority of the voting populace, and that she can not take responsibility for her mistakes. Those are very undesirable traits in a person who is running for president of the US.

Trump is even worse, don't get me wrong.
---
i dont like signatures
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1