LogFAQs > #887323370

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Body cams are "unfair to officers" according to the police union...
UnfairRepresent 09/26/17 12:14:34 PM #62:	darkjedilink posted... DifferentialEquation posted... Solid Sonic posted... DifferentialEquation posted... I wouldn't say they're unfair, but they're not needed and a waste of money. If I want to know the details of what transpired, then I'll look at the officer's written statements instead of trying to make a judgement based off of potentially shaky/grain and ultimately unreliable video footage. But what's the corroboration? Police officers take oaths to protect and serve their community. That's all the corroboration I need for their testimonies. You're fucking kidding, right? You're literally giving cops carte blanche to lie. Except a thing called evidence exists. If a cop shot or attacked someone there would be evidence to show what happened. If the evidence goes against the testimony then he is fucked, if it supports the testimony he's in the black. You're acting like the only thing stopping a cop from running into the street and mowing down children with an AK-47 is shakey bodycam footage. That's absolute pure fantasy. There has never ever been an affect of note in court caused by bodycam footage. At best it just supports existing evidence. Nothing more. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:887323370] in Body cams ... [t:75815765]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Solid Sonic posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldn't say they're unfair, but they're not needed and a waste of money. If I want to know the details of what transpired, then I'll look at the officer's written statements instead of trying to make a judgement based off of potentially shaky/grain and ultimately unreliable video footage.</quote> But what's the corroboration?</quote> Police officers take oaths to protect and serve their community. That's all the corroboration I need for their testimonies.</quote> You're fucking kidding, right? You're literally giving cops carte blanche to lie.</quote> Except a thing called evidence exists. If a cop shot or attacked someone there would be evidence to show what happened. If the evidence goes against the testimony then he is fucked, if it supports the testimony he's in the black. You're acting like the only thing stopping a cop from running into the street and mowing down children with an AK-47 is shakey bodycam footage. That's absolute pure fantasy. There has never ever been an affect of note in court caused by bodycam footage. At best it just supports existing evidence. Nothing more. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1